Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavies, Alexander Stewart, juhendajaet
dc.contributor.authorSoodla, Helo Liiset
dc.contributor.otherTartu Ülikool. Humanitaarteaduste ja kunstide valdkondet
dc.contributor.otherTartu Ülikool. Filosoofia osakondet
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-17T10:22:48Z
dc.date.available2019-06-17T10:22:48Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.other20.03.02 SOOd 01et
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10062/64389
dc.description.abstractFinally, in this thesis I have shown that four accounts of slurs consider the social context of both Estonia and anglophone countries to be such that it satisfies the criteria for a word in said context to be a slur. However, besides a brief note on the omitted theories, I have not touched upon why accounts centred around CIs or presuppositions have not been explicitly addressed in this thesis. One reason for this is that the ‘tests’ these two accounts use to assess slurs include comparing how their derogatory aspect scopes out under negation, in conditionals, etc. However, it is unclear whether the linguistic constructions in Estonian straightforwardly model those in English (e.g. kui…siis vs if…then). This poses a larger question for analytical philosophy done in different languages. According to Pérez (2018, p. 10), “language is not a neutral vehicle for our thoughts”. It might be the case that in my analysis of Estonian and English words I have not paid enough attention to how the different languages themselves affect the ideas, concepts and proposals put forward. Altogether these remarks point to a necessity for refining our understanding of formal semantics for Estonian in the future. Comparing slur-like words could be of help in clarifying these distinctions.en
dc.description.urihttps://www.ester.ee/record=b5239697et
dc.language.isoenget
dc.publisherTartu Ülikoolet
dc.rightsopenAccesset
dc.rightsAutorile viitamine + Mitteäriline eesmärk + Tuletatud teoste keeld 3.0 Eesti*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ee/*
dc.subjectanalytical philosophyen
dc.subjectsemantic analysisen
dc.subject.otherbakalaureusetöödet
dc.subject.othersemantiline analüüset
dc.subject.otheranalüütiline filosoofiaet
dc.titleSlur or False Friend? An Assessment of "False Friends” Argumentsen
dc.typeThesiset


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as openAccess