DSpace Repository

DSpace at University of Tartu is a repository for all electronic materials

search interfaces such as BASE and DART-Europe provide integrated access to millions records worldwide
open up this content to local and global audiences, thanks to the OAI-PMH interface and Google Scholar optimizations
issue permanent urls and trustworthy identifiers, including optional integrations with handle.net and DataCite DOI

Located at University of Tartu Library

Communities in DSpace

Select a community to browse its collections.

Now showing 1 - 14 of 14

Recent Submissions

Item

Burkhard Nonnenmacher: Vernunft und Glaube bei Kant. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018. 425 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-16-155716-3.

(2018) Geismann, Georg

Item

Rezension. Dieter Hüning / Stefan Klingner (Hrsg.): ... jenen süßen Traum träumen. Kants Friedensschrift zwischen objektiver Geltung und Utopie, Baden-Baden: Nomos 2018

(2021) Geismann, Georg

Item

Rezension. Martin Heuser: Zur Positivität des Rechts in der kritischen Naturrechtslehre Immanuel Kants. Eine Studie zum metaphysischen Begriff des provisorisch-rechtlichen Besitzes. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2020. 706 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-428-15861-4

(2021) Geismann, Georg

Item

Kants Rechtslehre zwischen ethischer Überhöhung und positivistischer Verflachung. Zum Scheitern von Martin Heusers angeblich "dezidiert metaphysischem" Unternehmen, "die Riege der führenden Kantinterpreten" das Fürchten zu lehren

(2021) Geismann, Georg

Item

Rezension. Claudio Corradetti, Kant, Global Politics and Cosmopolitan Law. The World Republic as a Regulative Idea of Reason, Berlin/New York: Routledge 2020

(2020) Geismann, Georg

Item

Zur Rolle der Freiheit in Kants (Moral-)Philosophie

(2020) Geismann, Georg

The focus of this paper is on the concepts of practical and transcendental freedom, their relation to each other, and their role in Kant’s (moral) philosophy. It is argued that there is in this regard neither an inconsistency or contradiction between the Dialectic and the Canon of the first Critique nor a break between the first and the second Critique. The Canon’s claim that we cognize practical freedom through experience must by no means be understood as implying that Kant held a “naturalized” concept of freedom. The paper also reveals the preparatory role of the first Critique with respect to the moral philosophy that Kant, beginning in the Groundwork, presented in the following years.