Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMcNamara, Eoin Micheál, juhendaja
dc.contributor.authorLahtmäe, Karin-Liis
dc.contributor.otherTartu Ülikool. Sotsiaal- ja haridusteaduskondet
dc.contributor.otherTartu Ülikool. Riigiteaduste instituutet
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-15T11:57:57Z
dc.date.available2015-06-15T11:57:57Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10062/47122
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the strengths and weaknesses of Indonesia’s hegemony-building. Qualitative research is carried out on three levels of analysis – the domestic, regional and global. The author has reformulated Pedersen’s (2002) three capacities to be indicative of regional hegemony-building: the domestic, ideational and international capacity. The study finds that Indonesia’s regional hegemony-building is weakened by its domestic capacity. Despite a strong ideational capacity, on a regional level this does not translate into strong hegemonic capacity. On a global level, the capacity is quantitatively bigger, yet marginal in effect. The thesis concludes that regional hegemony discourse should focus on the embryonic capacities of hegemony-building instead of trying to fit emerging regional powers into pre-existing strategies of regional hegemony.en
dc.description.urihttp://www.ester.ee/record=b4486301*est
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTartu Ülikoolet
dc.subject.othermagistritöödet
dc.subject.otherhegemooniaet
dc.subject.otherIndoneesiaet
dc.titleIndonesia: an analysis of regional hegemony-buildingen
dc.typeThesisen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record