Show simple item record

dc.contributor"European Union (EU)" and "Horizon 2020"
dc.contributor.authorVits, Kristel
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Eiki
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-25T13:05:54Z
dc.date.available2019-02-25T13:05:54Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10062/63376
dc.description.abstractThis memo discusses the “do or die” dilemma of post-Soviet de facto states. Our examination looks in to patron-client relations that are highly unequal and asymmetric in terms of resources and capabilities: Russia vis-à-vis Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria, and Armenia vis-à-vis Nagorno-Karabakh. While relying entirely on a militarily and economically resourceful external patron is often seen as the only viable option, de facto states may be risking the loss of their “independence.” Hence their “do or die” dilemma that structures many of their policies.et
dc.language.isoenget
dc.publisherPONARS Eurasiaet
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/691818///UPTAKEet
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPONARS Eurasia Policy Memo;527, 1−5
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesset
dc.subjectde facto stateset
dc.subjectpatron-client relationset
dc.subjectde facto state foreign policyet
dc.subjectpolicy memoet
dc.subjectde facto riigidet
dc.subjectpatrooni-kliendi suhtedet
dc.subjectde facto riigi välispoliitikaet
dc.subjectpoliitikamemoet
dc.titleThe Do-or-Die Dilemma Facing Post-Soviet De Facto Stateset
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleet


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record