Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorVolberg, Mats, juhendajaet
dc.contributor.authorTuul, Otoet
dc.contributor.otherTartu Ülikool. Humanitaarteaduste ja kunstide valdkondet
dc.contributor.otherTartu Ülikool. Filosoofia osakondet
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-17T10:42:03Z
dc.date.available2019-06-17T10:42:03Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.other20.03.02 TUU 01et
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10062/64394
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this thesis was to create a framework in which to understand the debate over the limits of free speech in law, give an overview of few positions in this framework and finally see if offensiveness could be a suitable criterion for limiting free speech. I propose that there is a fundamental contradiction between the values of free speech and equality which forms the backbone of the debate. Thus, three possible positions form on the matter: for free speech over equality, for equality over free speech, or compromise without sacrificing either too much.en
dc.description.urihttps://www.ester.ee/record=b5239714et
dc.language.isoestet
dc.publisherTartu Ülikoolet
dc.rightsopenAccesset
dc.rightsAutorile viitamine + Mitteäriline eesmärk + Tuletatud teoste keeld 3.0 Eesti*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ee/*
dc.subjectphilosophyen
dc.subjecthate speechen
dc.subjectliberty of speechen
dc.subjectphilosophical inquiryen
dc.subject.otherbakalaureusetöödet
dc.subject.othervaenu õhutamineet
dc.subject.othersõnavabaduset
dc.subject.otherfilosoofiaet
dc.titleVabadus solvata: filosoofiline uurimus vihakõnest ja sõnavabaduse piiridest, miks solvamine ei ole kohane alus sõnavabaduse piiramisekset
dc.typeThesiset


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as openAccess