Tamm, Gerly, juhendajaUrm, KatarinaTartu Ülikool. Sotsiaalteaduste valdkondTartu Ülikool. Psühholoogia instituut2026-06-122026-06-122026https://hdl.handle.net/10062/122054Study piloted effects of different state rumination induction methods and qualitatively studied what factors facilitate or inhibit rumination induction. Three methods were used: sad autobiographical memory with Response Manipulation Task (RMT); sad film with autobiographical memory and RMT; sad melody with sad autobiographical memory and RMT. Control groups had same conditions without rumination and negative valence components. 86 people completed online experiment, and 8 participated in interviews. Results were statistically not significant. Based on the interviews, factors inducing rumination were: presence of personally significant sad memory; prior low mood; and self-reported emotional sensitivity. Inhibiting factors included: absence of significant memory; positive reappraisal during task; perceived low intensity of stimuli. Results of study contribute to understanding rumination mechanisms and to improvement of experimental paradigms.enAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ruminationrumination inductionmood inductionactivation of negative thoughtsrepetitive negative thinkingrumineeriminemõtisklemise esilekutsuminemeeleolu esilekutsuminenegatiivsete mõtete aktiveeriminekorduv negatiivne mõtlemineüliõpilastöödThesis