Sirvi Autor "Foxon, Floe" järgi
Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 2 2
- Tulemused lehekülje kohta
- Sorteerimisvalikud
listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Artificial neural network for hoax cryptogram identification(Tartu University Library, 2024) Foxon, Floe; Waldispühl, Michelle; Megyesi, BeátaNumerous putative cryptograms remain unsolved. Some, including the Dorabella cryptogram, have been suggestedas hoaxes, i.e., some sort of gibberish with no meaningful underlying plaintext.The statistical properties of a putative cryptogram may be modelled to determine whether the cryptogram groups moreclosely with real or with randomly generated plaintext. Ten thousand plaintexts from an English-language corpus, and ten thousand (pseudo-)randomly generated English-alphabet gibberish texts were studied through their statistical properties, including the alphabet length; the frequency, separation, and entropy of n-grams; the index of coincidence; Zipf’slaw, and mean associated contact counts. An artificial neural network (deep learning) model was fitted to these data, with a cross-validated mean accuracy of 99.8% (standard deviation: 0.1%). This model correctly predicted that arbitrary, out-of-sample simple substitution ciphers represented meaningful English plaintext (as opposed to gibberish) with probabilities close to 1; correctly predicted that arbitrary, out-of-sample gibberish texts were gibberish (as opposed to simple substitution ciphers) with probabilities close to 1; and assigned a probability of meaningful English plaintext of 0.9996 to the Dorabella cryptogram.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Machine learning for text classification in classical cryptography(Tartu University Library, 2025) Foxon, Floe; Antal, Eugen; Marák, PavolThis study furthers previous work on text classification to distinguish between ciphertext and gibberish. The statistical/linguistic properties of four text types were studied: meaningful English text, and three gibberish types (n=1,250 each; total N=5,000). Dimension reduction techniques (PCA, t-SNE, and UMAP) were used to reduce the statistical/linguistic feature space of the texts to two dimensions, revealing distinct regions of (lower dimensional) feature space occupied by each text, with some overlap. Machine learning models including random forests, neural networks (NNs), and support vector machines (SVMs) were used to classify the four text types based on their statistical/linguistic properties. Nested cross-validation revealed better generalization performance for the NNs and SVMs, classifying texts with >90% accuracy. Applied to the Dorabella cryptogram, the models suggest that this text resembles meaningful English text more closely than gibberish types, which comports with the Dorabella cryptogram as a monoalphabetic substitution cipher, but this classification should be interpreted with caution. Features that better separate meaningful English from English-like gibberish are needed, and other encryption schemes/cryptograms should be explored with these methods.