Sirvi Autor "Luik, Mark-Emil" järgi

Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 2 2

listelement.badge.access-status Avatud juurdepääs ,
Eksplitsiitse "Ma ei tea" valiku mõju äratundmisotsustele samaaegsetes äratundmisridades
(2023) Luik, Mark-Emil; Palu, Annegrete; Tartu Ülikool. Psühholoogia instituut; Tartu Ülikool. Sotsiaalteaduste valdkond
listelement.badge.access-status Avatud juurdepääs ,
Training metacognitive skills in an upper-secondary school: feasibility and preliminary outcomes
(Tartu Ülikool, 2026) Luik, Mark-Emil; Voodla, Alan, juhendaja; Kruup, Kaspar, juhendaja; Tartu Ülikool. Sotsiaalteaduste valdkond; Tartu Ülikool. Psühholoogia instituut
This thesis evaluated the feasibility and preliminary psychological outcomes of a school-based metacognitive skills course for upper-secondary students. The study was conducted in a real-world school setting using a controlled longitudinal design with two 11th-grade classes. One class participated in a four-month metacognitive skills training course, while the other served as a control group. Students completed questionnaires at baseline, immediately after the course, and at a six-month follow-up. Outcomes included emotion regulation skills, metacognitive self-regulation processes, psychological well-being, and growth mindset. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment and retention, and preliminary outcome changes were analysed using linear mixed-effects models. Recruitment was promising, with 43 of 52 eligible students providing valid baseline data. Retention was moderate across measurement occasions. Preliminary analyses did not show clear intervention-related improvements in the main psychological outcomes. Although some changes were observed over time, these were not consistently specific to the intervention group. Overall, the findings suggest that a metacognitive skills course can be implemented and studied in an upper-secondary school context. However, the small sample size, non-randomized class-level design, attrition, and measurement limitations prevent strong conclusions about effectiveness. The study should be interpreted primarily as a feasibility study informing future research.