Sirvi Autor "Mölder, Martin" järgi
Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 4 4
- Tulemused lehekülje kohta
- Sorteerimisvalikud
listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Avatud juurdepääs , Korvpalluri visketabavust mõjutavad tegurid(Tartu Ülikool, 2017) Mölder, Martin; Kandimaa, Toomas, juhendaja; Tartu Ülikool. Sporditeaduste ja füsioteraapia instituut; Tartu Ülikool. Kehalise kasvatuse ja spordi õppekavalistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Avatud juurdepääs , Making Identity Count: Estonia 2020(2025) Mölder, MartinThe year 2020 in Estonian politics and society, like elsewhere around the world, was dominated by the COVID crisis, which, especially during the spring and autumn of the year, set the tone for much of public debate. The domestic political situation was fraught with diverse issues as the governmental coalition was struggling with public/elite opposition to the Estonian Conservative People’s Party (EKRE), a populist party that was included in the governing coalition following the 2019 elections. Concurrently, Estonia achieved a foreign policy milestone, serving a term as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council. In the context of the COVID crisis, Estonia’s economy did see a 2.5% downturn (Bank of Estonia 2025), but, overall, the government handled the crisis well as the following years demonstrated Estonia’s swift recovery from the effects of the pandemic. The current report examines the construction of Estonian national identity in 2020. Drawing from a dataset of 2294 coded references to aspects of what constitutes being Estonian from political speeches, newspapers, letters to editors, films, novels, and history textbooks, the analysis reveals a public sphere characterized by distinct patterns of discourse distribution: elite sources monopolize discussions of politics, international relations, and formal national identity construction with predominantly positive valences while mass sources set the tone for this discourse around social structure, gender roles, and everyday life experiences with more critical and ambivalent emotional tones. The context of the pandemic provides a unique lens for examining how crisis conditions define discursive divisions, with elite sources framing government responses positively while mass discourse, conversely, expresses more scepticism and criticism. The analysis identifies five major thematic clusters – Politics/Economy, Social Structure, Estonianness, Historical Others, and Significant Others. The categories Education and Estonian language emerge as rare points of convergence between elite and mass discourse.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Avatud juurdepääs , Tajutud kehalise kasvatuse õpetaja kontrolliv käitumine ja õpilaste objektiivselt mõõdetud kehaline aktiivsus trans-kontekstilise motivatsioonimudeli raamistikus. Perceived teacher’s controlling behaviour and students´ objectively measured physical activity in the trans-contextual model framework(Tartu: Tartu Ülikool, 2019) Mölder, Martin; Koka, A., juhendajalistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Embargo , The politics of unpredictability: Acc/secession of Crimea and the blurring of international norms.(Routledge, 2018) Berg, Eiki; Mölder, MartinThis article focuses on prominent recent episodes where Russia has put sovereignty, the obligation to refrain (O2R) from using force, and self-determination to the test. Most recently in the Crimean context, we see that Russia’s systematic instrumental use of these norms does not contest the norms as such, but as their application becomes more contingent and arbitrary, their meaning is nevertheless blurred. We additionally explore how other justifications were applied alongside self-determination, which were all linked to interference in the internal political processes of another state, facilitating secession and incorporating part of the territory of the latter. We introduce the concept of blurring and show how the production of floating signifiers has become Russia’s preferred strategy in the international war of interpretations. This politics of unpredictability has led Russia to act in self-defence unilaterally and outside of the framework of the United Nations (UN), going against not only some of its own declared principles while following others, but also further strengthening the discursive gap with the West.