Sirvi Autor "Ventsel, Andreas" järgi
Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 8 8
- Tulemused lehekülje kohta
- Sorteerimisvalikud
listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Communicating environmental issues on British mainstream party platforms(Tartu Ülikool, 2023) Baghdasaryan, Naira; Ventsel, Andreas; Tartu Ülikool. Humanitaarteaduste ja kunstide valdkond; Tartu Ülikool. Filosoofia ja semiootika instituutlistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Communicating like a Bolsonaro: Projection of Bolsonarist strategic narratives through anti-China memes(Tartu Ülikool, 2021) Jarmendia, Marcelo; Ventsel, Andreas; Tartu Ülikool. Humanitaarteaduste ja kunstide valdkond; Tartu Ülikool. Filosoofia ja semiootika instituutlistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , The Construction of the Image of Ukraine as the Other in Russian Media(Tartu Ülikool, 2018) Synytsina, Kapitolina; Ventsel, Andreas; Tartu Ülikool. Humanitaarteaduste ja kunstide valdkond; Tartu Ülikool. Filosoofia ja semiootika instituutlistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Health panic mechanisms in the COVID-19 discourse in Estonia(Tartu Ülikool, 2020) Peterson, Kristiina; Madisson, Mari-Liis; Ventsel, Andreas; Tartu Ülikool. Humanitaarteaduste ja kunstide valdkond; Tartu Ülikool. Filosoofia ja semiootika instituutlistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Magic and Power in Ritualistic Artivism: Symbolic Revolution of Death Worlds(Tartu Ülikool, 2024) Jaramillo, Tatiana; Puumeister, Ott; Ventsel, Andreas; Creighton, Andrew Mark; Tartu Ülikool. Humanitaarteaduste ja kunstide valdkond; Tartu Ülikool. Filosoofia ja semiootika instituutlistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , "Meie" konstrueerimine Eesti poliitilises retoorikas 1940.-1953.a.(2005) Ventsel, Andreas; Pärli, Ülle, 1952-, juhendajalistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , The semiotics of nation branding: analysis of the official discourse of China in the past decade (2008-2018)(Tartu Ülikool, 2019) Yu, Zhou; Ventsel, Andreas; Tartu Ülikool. Humanitaarteaduste ja kunstide valdkond; Tartu Ülikool. Filosoofia ja semiootika instituutlistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Towards semiotic theory of hegemony(2009-11-13T09:07:32Z) Ventsel, AndreasAndreas Ventsel’s dissertation TOWARD SEMIOTIC THEORY OF HEGEMONY consists of an introductory chapter and five papers. They are primarily focused on establishing political semiotics as a specific discipline, which would give researchers better means for analysing the field of politics, which is the reason for focusing primarily on integration of the cultural semiotics of the Tartu-Moscow School and theory of hegemony by Essex School. From this elaborated theoretical framework was analysed empirical material, which is all taken from Estonian contemporary history . In paper 1 (The construction of the ‘we’-category: Political rhetoric in Soviet Estonia from June 1940 to July 1941. Sign System Studies, 2007, 35. ½, 249-267 ) I focus on applying one alternative approach to the research of political discourse, analysing how power relations are established through pronouns (deictics) used in political speeches in first soviet period. Papers 2 (Towards a semiotic theory of hegemony: Naming as hegemonic operation in Lotman and Laclau. Sign System Studies m 2008, 36.1, 167-183) and 3 (An outline for a semiotic theory of hegemony. Semiotica, 2009, xx - xx. [forthcoming]) (both co-written with Peeter Selg) I elaborate the model of this theoretical approach, using the discourse of the Bronze Night and the Singing Revolution as the analysis material. Paper 4 (Hegemooniline tähistamisprotsess fotograafias [Hegemonic process of signification in photograph]. Kunstiteaduslikke uurimusi. 2009, XX-XX [forthcoming]) tries to distinguish some of the signification practices of the visualisation of power by examining the hegemonic signifying strategies that were used in creating “the people” in the public picture-producing regime during the Stalinist period. The paper also makes use of Barthes’ semiotic and visual rhetoric views on photography. Paper 5 (The role of political rhetoric in the development of Soviet totalitarian language. Russian Journal of Communication, Vol. II, No. 1/2 (Winter/Spring 2009), 9-26) tries to explicate, within the created framework, the phenomenon of totalitarian language of the Soviet era.