Sirvi Märksõna "biovõim" järgi
Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 5 5
- Tulemused lehekülje kohta
- Sorteerimisvalikud
listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Embargo , Biopolitical art and the struggle for Sovereignty in Putin’s Russia. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern(Routledge, 2019) Makarychev, Andrey; Medvedev, SergeyThis article addresses the public appeal of political actionism in today’s Russia through analysis of the political art of Pyotr Pavlensky. The research uses the methodological paradigm of biopower and biopolitics, as outlined by Michel Foucault and further critically developed by Giorgio Agamben, since it helps to better understand both the oppressive nature of the Russian state, and the protest art of Pavlensky. The article seeks to unpack the struggle for the human body that has started in Russia in recent years, with the state imposing its normalizing and regulatory mechanisms upon private lives and corporeal practices of individuals, and people’s responses by re-claiming their bodies, from an open public discussion of sexuality, domestic violence and gender equality, to the radical exposure of the body by artists like Pavlensky. As the argument goes, the centerpiece of political controversy is not just the battle for the human body, but a battle for sovereignty, defining the limits of state intervention, the borders of the political community and the rights of the individual. The article asks a number of questions: how Pavlensky’s performances can be explained within the framework of the biopolitical regime of Putin’s rule? Whether Pavlensky’s use of his own body for political purposes (a “biopolitical art’ of sorts) is a response to the increased biopolitical intervention of the Russian state that has marked Putin’s third term in office? Why did political protest become corporeal? How does the individual body turn into a tool for political contestation and how does it embody collective meanings? How the politicization of the body transpires, and how an individual body can incarnate a collective body of nation?listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Avatud juurdepääs , Biopolitical conservatism and “pastoral power”: a Russia – Georgia meeting point.(Tbilisi: Georgian Institute of Politics., 2017) Makarychev, AndreyThe paper applies the concept of biopolitics to the analysis of Russia's relations with Georgia. It highlights the centrality of Orthodoxy for Russia's "soft power" and religious diplomacy.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Embargo , Biopolitics and national identities: between liberalism and totalization(Routledge, 2017) Makarychev, AndreyThis is an introductory article to the special cluster on the biopolitical reading of nation-building in post-Soviet countries. The authors explain the advatnages of using the biopolitical approach to countries with hybrid identities, and discuss the totalizing potential of biopolitical narrativeslistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Embargo , Russian Speakers in Estonia: Legal, (Bio)Political and Security Insights(Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan., 2016) Makarychev, Andrey; Hoffmann, ThomasThe key question this chapter tackles is how two governments, the Russian and the Estonian, tackle a whole range of issues pertaining to the Russian-speaking community of Estonia. The authors single out the legal, political and security aspects of the existence and functioning of this community and put them into different contexts, in particular those embedded in Estonia’s relations with the EU, EU-Russia conflicts and the refugee crisis in Europe.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Embargo , The biopolitical turn in post-ideological times: a trajectory of Russian transformation(Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2017) Makarychev, AndreyThe authors study the applicability of the concept of biopolitics to contemporary Russian society and the ruling regime. The article singles our several domains of biopower that play major roles in defining the nature of Russian political regime