Sirvi Märksõna "geopolitics" järgi
Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 6 6
- Tulemused lehekülje kohta
- Sorteerimisvalikud
listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Avatud juurdepääs , A Time for Alternative Options? Prospects for the Nordic-Baltic Security Community During the Trump Era(Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs, 2017) McNamara, Eoin Micheállistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Embargo , Between Trump's America and Putin's Russia: Nordic-Baltic Security Relations amid Transatlantic Drift(Royal Irish Academy, 2017) McNamara, Eoin MicheálWith the ‘return of geopolitics’ in Europe signalled in earnest by Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014, this article examines the implications of DonaldTrump’s unpredictable US security policy for regional security in Northern Europe. While Trump’s public rhetoric chastising NATO creates uncertainties for Europe’s security, his administration’s policy has remained committed to NATO’s deterrence efforts. Against initial expectations for US-Russia rapprochementbased on realpolitik during the Trump era, controversies and the administration’s security policy actions have brought some unexpected discord in relations with Russia. A realist ‘grand bargain’ between Moscow and Washington that marginalises Nordic and Baltic security interests has become a remote prospect. Despite these reprieves, enhanced Nordic-Baltic security and defence cooperation is increasingly necessary. Overcoming occasional divergence in strategic preferences for effective military cooperation will ensure that the Nordic and Baltic states can strengthen regional deterrence and improve political relations with the Trump administration in an era of possible ‘transatlantic drift’.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Embargo , Biopower and Geopolitics as Russia's neighbourhood strategies: reconnecting people or reaggregating lands?(Routledge, 2017) Makarychev, AndreyIn this article, we address geopolitics and biopower as two different yet mutually correlative discursive strategies of sovereign power in Russia. We challenge the dominant realist approaches to Russia’s neighborhood policy by introducing the concept of biopolitics as its key element, which makes analysis of political relations in the post-Soviet area more nuanced and variegated. More specifically, we address an important distinction between geopolitical control over territories and management of population as two of Russia’s strategies in its “near abroad.”listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Avatud juurdepääs , Ethnopolitics in Central and Eastern Europe in a State of Flux(Taylor & Francis Online, 2019) Petsinis, VassilisThis is the introduction to a special section based on selected contributions for the ‘Ethnopolitics in Central and Eastern Europe in a State of Flux’ international conference (UPTAKE research consortium, Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies, University of Tartu, Estonia, February 9th- 10th, 2018).listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Avatud juurdepääs , Geopolitics, Ethnopolitics and the EU: The Cases of Serbia and Latvia(Taylor & Francis Online, 2019) Petsinis, VassilisThis work is a study on the patterns of managing ethnic relations in Serbia and Latvia. It aims at enhancing the cross-regional exchange of knowledge between the Western Balkans and the Baltic States. This study demonstrates that as the bond between geopolitics and ethnopolitics grows more powerful, the liberalization of minority policies would become less feasible within a state. It also hints that the intersection between geopolitics and ethnopolitics should not be perceived as ‘fixed’ but it can be subject to fluctuations and readjustments. Therefore, the interaction between endogenous and exogenous actors can impact the engagement(s) by the EU in the field of minority rights to varying degrees and within different contexts.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , listelement.badge.access-status Avatud juurdepääs , Reconsidering geography and power: policy ensembles, spatial knowledge, and the quest for consistent imagination(2014-11-18) Veemaa, JaanusVäitekirja põhihuvi on selgitada, kuidas võimuinstitutsioonid kasutavad geograafilist teadmist ruumiliste poliitikate kujundamisel. Uurimustöö argumendid tuginevad seisukohal, mille järgi ruumiliste poliitikate tõhusus on sõltuvuses kasutatava geograafilise teadmise funktsionaalsest, kontseptuaalsest ja ideoloogilisest sidususest. Väitekiri koosneb neljast teemakohasest uurimusest (Eesti ruumilise identiteedi kujundamine ajaloo- ja geograafiaõpikute tootmise protsessis; Eesti maakondade staatuse visioneerimine teostamata jäänud haldus-territoriaalses reformis aastatel 1997–2003; Balti solidaarsuse argumenteerimine Eesti-Läti riigipiiri taastamise ja piirirežiimi kujundamise protsessis, ning Haparanda (Rootsi) ja Tornio (Soome) piirilinnade rahvusvahelise identiteedi kujundamine). Väitekirja uurimused kinnitavad, et geograafilise teadmise kasutamine ruumiliste poliitikate kujundamisel on tihti vastuoluline, ja poliitikate eesmärke nõrgalt toetav. Võimuinstitutsioonid ei pööra piisavalt tähelepanu institutsionaalse koordineerimise ja strateegilise lähenemise vajalikkusele poliitikate ruumilisel mõtestamisel. Poliitilised agendad ja strateegiad sisaldavad harva viiteid või juhiseid, kuidas tagada geograafilise teadmise kontseptuaalne ja ideoloogiline sidusus poliitikates. Lisaks toovad juhtumuuringud välja kolm olulist tegurit, mille mõju geograafilise mõtestamise tõhususele poliitikate kujundamisel kaldutakse sageli alahindama: kaasamine teadmise mõtestamise protsessi (kes ja millistel tingimustel osalevad), teadmise ajakohastamine (kui poliitikate eesmärgid reformiprotsessi käigus muutuvad või teisenevad) ning teadmise kaalutletud vahendamine (arvestamine ruumiliste poliitikate mõjudega).