Can summarization approximate simplification? A gold standard comparison

dc.contributor.authorMagnifico, Giacomo
dc.contributor.authorBarbu, Eduard
dc.contributor.editorJohansson, Richard
dc.contributor.editorStymne, Sara
dc.coverage.spatialTallinn, Estonia
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-18T13:44:10Z
dc.date.available2025-02-18T13:44:10Z
dc.date.issued2025-03
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the overlap between text summarization and simplification outputs. While summarization evaluation methods are streamlined, simplification lacks cohesion, prompting the question: how closely can abstractive summarization resemble gold-standard simplification? We address this by applying two BART-based BRIO summarization methods to the Newsela corpus, comparing outputs with manually annotated simplifications and achieving a top ROUGE-L score of 0.654. This provides insight into where summarization and simplification outputs converge and differ.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10062/107233
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Tartu Library
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNEALT Proceedings Series, No. 57
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleCan summarization approximate simplification? A gold standard comparison
dc.typeArticle

Failid

Originaal pakett

Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 1 1
Laen...
Pisipilt
Nimi:
2025_nodalida_1_41.pdf
Suurus:
141.98 KB
Formaat:
Adobe Portable Document Format