Can summarization approximate simplification? A gold standard comparison
| dc.contributor.author | Magnifico, Giacomo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Barbu, Eduard | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Johansson, Richard | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Stymne, Sara | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Tallinn, Estonia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-18T13:44:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-18T13:44:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-03 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study explores the overlap between text summarization and simplification outputs. While summarization evaluation methods are streamlined, simplification lacks cohesion, prompting the question: how closely can abstractive summarization resemble gold-standard simplification? We address this by applying two BART-based BRIO summarization methods to the Newsela corpus, comparing outputs with manually annotated simplifications and achieving a top ROUGE-L score of 0.654. This provides insight into where summarization and simplification outputs converge and differ. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10062/107233 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | University of Tartu Library | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | NEALT Proceedings Series, No. 57 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.title | Can summarization approximate simplification? A gold standard comparison | |
| dc.type | Article |
Failid
Originaal pakett
1 - 1 1