UPTAKE 2018-2019 aasta publikatsioonid
Selle kollektsiooni püsiv URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/10062/63086
Sirvi
Sirvi UPTAKE 2018-2019 aasta publikatsioonid Kuupäev järgi
Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 20 54
- Tulemused lehekülje kohta
- Sorteerimisvalikud
listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Dealing with the Past: Transitional Justice and De-communization(Routledge, 2017) Pettai, Eva-Clarita; Pettai, VelloThis chapter reviews the literature around the study of post-communist transitional justice. It begins by comparing how different scholars have conceptualized transitional justice, particularly the range of empirical phenomena that authors have decided to encompass when they have dealt with truth and justice issues. Secondly, the chapter shows how, depending on an author’s empirical delineation of the phenomenon, the independent variables chosen across time or across countries have also varied. Thirdly, the chapter turns the methodological equation around and examines those (albeit far fewer) scholars who have examined transitional justice as a causal phenomenon and sought to answer what transitional justice actually brings to society. Lastly, the overview presents a set of sub-themes in the field of post-communist transitional justice, namely the comparative study of institutions devoted to TJ, the growing importance of international influences on TJ, and the place of specifically post-conflict TJ in the context of former Yugoslavia.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Balancing between consolidation and cartel. The effects of party law in Estonia.(Routledge, 2017) Pettai, VelloOver the last decade the institutionalist study of political parties has taken a new turn. The turn has been toward the in-depth study of party law and party regulation. Such institutions ostensibly operate as uniform determinants of behavior, regardless of population size. Hence, the case of Estonia, while being small in size and population, is interesting because it has been one of the more successful post-communist party systems to consolidate over the last 20 years. The argument in this chapter is therefore that this outcome has been a combination of increasing regulation in five particular domains: constitutional provisions, electoral rules, party registration requirements, parliamentary rules, and party finance. These are profiled as they appear across a chronological overview of changes in party law and party regulation over the last 20 years.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Russian “Federalism”: Illiberal? Imperial? Exceptionalist?(2018) Makarychev, Andrey; Yatsyk, Alexandralistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , In Between War and Peace: The Conceptualisation of Russian Strategic Deterrence(Tartu : Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, 2018) Lucassen, Okke GeurtThe Russian Federation has expanded its foreign policy instruments in recent years to include a broader range of tools, both military and non-military for times of peace and war. The implications of this pivot in Russian foreign policy is often referred to in terms such as Hybrid Warfare, Cross-Domain Coercion, New Generation War, or the Gerasimov doctrine. Examples of this turn include the annexation of Crimea, the use of paramilitary groups (such as the Wagner Group), and foreign election tampering. The present paper contributes to the growing literature on contemporary Russian foreign policy by dissecting what the Russian Federation has named ‘Strategic Deterrence’ (сдерживание стратегическое) as a part of its foreign policy strategy. Whilst established theories of foreign policy strategies such as Hybrid Warfare have been adapted to better fit the contemporary Russian model, the notion of Russian Strategic Deterrence is best understood through its conceptualisation as a uniquely Russian take on contemporary foreign policy. This paper provides an analysis on how Russian perceptions of Western expansionism have influenced the Russian conceptualisation of Strategic Deterrence, and how the Russian concept of Strategic Deterrence is distinct from seemingly similar and commonly interchanged concepts such as Hybrid Warfare.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Sovereignty and Russian national identity-making: The biopolitical dimension(Edinburgh University Press, 2018) Yatsyk, Alexandra; Makarychev, AndreyThe chapter discuss issues of Russian sovereignty and identity from a biopolitical perspectivelistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Baltic Perspectives on the Ukraine Crisis: Europeanization in the Shadow of Insecurity(Foundation for Good Politics, 2018) Vilson, MailiThis article reviews the policy positions of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania with respect to the Ukraine crisis – the biggest foreign policy challenge for the Baltic states since they regained independence. Ukraine dominated the Baltic foreign policy agenda from the outbreak of the crisis, because it touched upon a dimension of existential threat for the Baltic countries. While giving an overview of the main policy domains where the effect of the Ukraine crisis could be observed, this article demonstrates that the three Baltic countries adopted a comprehensive approach to security and foreign policymaking, underlining cooperation both at a national and European level. In light of this, the Ukraine crisis can be seen as a maturity test for postindependence Baltic foreign policy.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Russia's Internal Otherness(Yale Global, 2018) Morozov, Viacheslavlistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Europe in Crisis: “Old,” “New,” or Incomplete?(PONARS Eurasia, 2018) Makarychev, Andrey; Kazharski, AliakseiThe memo discusses the current crisis in the EU institutions from the viewpoint of the ideas of "old" and "new" Europelistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Incomplete Hegemonies, Hybrid Neighbours: Identity Games and Policy Tools in Eastern Partnership Countries(2018) Makarychev, AndreyThe paper addresses the issues of EU's hegemony in its neighborhood and compares it with Russia's hegemonic roleslistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Russia and the EU Spaces of Interaction(Routledge, 2018) Makarychev, Andrey, toimetaja; Hoffmann, Thomas, toimetaja; Makarychev, Andrey; Hoffmann, ThomasThe annexation of Crimea in 2014 and Russia’s support for military insurgency in eastern Ukraine undermined two decades of cooperation between Russia and the EU leaving both sides in a situation of reciprocal economic sanctions and political alienation. What is left of previous positive experiences and mutually beneficial interactions between the two parties? And, what new communication practices and strategies might Russia and Europe use? Previously coherent and institutionalized spaces of communication and dialogue between Moscow and Brussels have fragmented into relations that, while certainly not cooperative, are also not necessarily adversarial. Exploring these spaces, contributors consider how this indeterminacy makes cooperation problematic, though not impossible, and examine the shrunken, yet still existent, expanse of interaction between Russia and the EU. Analysing to what extent Russian foreign policy philosophy is compatible with European ideas of democracy, and whether Russia might pragmatically profit from the liberal democratic order, the volume also focuses on the practical implementation of these discourses and conceptualizations as policy instruments. This book is an important resource for researchers in Russian and Soviet Politics, Eastern European Politics and the policy, politics and expansion of the European Union.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , The Politics of International Interaction with de facto States. Conceptualising Engagement without Recognition(London, New York: Routledge, 2018) Berg, Eiki, toimetaja; Ker-Lindsay, James, toimetaja; Berg, Eiki; Ker-Lindsay, JamesThis comprehensive volume is the first systematic effort to explore the ways in which recognised states and international organisations interact with secessionist ‘de facto states’, while maintaining the position that they are not regarded as independent sovereign actors in the international system. It is generally accepted by policy makers and scholars that some interaction with de facto states is vital, if only to promote a resolution of the underlying conflict that led to their decision to break away, and yet this policy of ‘engagement without recognition’ is not without complications and controversy. This book analyses the range of issues and problems that such interaction inevitably raises. The authors highlight fundamental questions of sovereignty, conflict management and resolution, settlement processes, foreign policy and statehood. This book will be of interest to policy makers, students and researchers of international relations. It was originally published as a special issue of the journal Ethnopolitics.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Sovereignty, Self-Determination, and Human Rights from Walzer to the Responsibility to Protect(2018) Piirimäe, EvaThis essay explores the intellectual context and conceptual foundations of R2P. Michael Walzer reinitiated debates about humanitarian intervention by grounding sovereignty and non-intervention in individual human rights and communal autonomy (self-determination). Liberal cosmopolitan critics of Walzer highlighted the tension between these two values, and proposed that sovereignty should rather be grounded in individual rights and democratic self-determination. In the post-Cold War era, international lawyers and international relations scholars came to endorse the idea that state sovereignty is qualified by the most basic human rights. High ranking UN officials further proposed that state sovereignty should be redefined as the sovereignty of the people, which, however, was seen as coextensive with the protection of the fundamental individual rights, and as such could be shared by the ‘international community’. R2P adopted a similar approach, glossing over the potential tensions between sovereignty, self-determination and human rights.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Boris Nemtsov and Russian Politics: Power and Resistance(Stuttgart: ibidem Verlag, 2018) Makarychev, Andrey; Yatsyk, AleksandraAn edited volume in commemoration of Boris Nemtsov's contribution to Russian politicslistelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , The politics of unpredictability: Acc/secession of Crimea and the blurring of international norms.(Routledge, 2018) Berg, Eiki; Mölder, MartinThis article focuses on prominent recent episodes where Russia has put sovereignty, the obligation to refrain (O2R) from using force, and self-determination to the test. Most recently in the Crimean context, we see that Russia’s systematic instrumental use of these norms does not contest the norms as such, but as their application becomes more contingent and arbitrary, their meaning is nevertheless blurred. We additionally explore how other justifications were applied alongside self-determination, which were all linked to interference in the internal political processes of another state, facilitating secession and incorporating part of the territory of the latter. We introduce the concept of blurring and show how the production of floating signifiers has become Russia’s preferred strategy in the international war of interpretations. This politics of unpredictability has led Russia to act in self-defence unilaterally and outside of the framework of the United Nations (UN), going against not only some of its own declared principles while following others, but also further strengthening the discursive gap with the West.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Introduction(Routledge, Taylor&Francis, 2018) Makarychev, Andrey; Hoffmann, ThomasThe end of the Cold War, the disintegration of the socialist system and the Soviet Union, the fall of the Berlin wall and the reunification of Germany engendered a series of innovative concepts reflecting the dominant state of minds among policy experts and practitioners at the end of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s. These included the de Gaulle-inspired idea of a “common European home” promoted by Mikhail Gorbachev, the expectations of the “end of history” articulated by Francis Fukuyama, and a number of post-modernist anticipations, from de-bordering to creating “security communities”, at least at a regional level, if not in the “wider Europe” from Lisbon to Vladivostok.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Beyond Geopolitics: Russian Soft Power, Conservatism, and Biopolitics(Brill’s publications, 2018) Makarychev, AndreyThis article offers a new approach to Russian foreign policy under Putin’s presidency as shifting from its ‘soft power’ model to what might be characterized through the prism of biopower. The author discusses the various meanings attached to the concept of attraction, and scrutinises the biopolitical turn in Russia as a domestic phenomenon and as a key element of Russia’s power projection abroad. It is argued that biopolitics as a power instrument can play different roles – it can be a tool to construct Russian national (and simultaneously imperial) identity and to distinguish Russia from the West, and channel for communication with conservative forces across the globe.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Face to face with conservative religious values: Assessing the EU's normative impact in the South Caucasus(London, New York: Routledge, 2018) Berg, Eiki; Kilp, AlarThe article analyzes how Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia react to the EU’s soft power, which is mainly based on its human rights policy including the freedom of religion and the promotion of pluralism. The EU has limited soft power in the South Caucasus. It remains attractive but only to a relative degree. The EU’s normative power is challenged by conservative value orientations which are backed up by religious institutions and politicians seeking to maximize their political gains.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , Pluralism without Democracy, Vertical without Power: From Gor’kii to Nizhny Novgorod . . . and Back?(Slavic Review, 2018) Makarychev, AndreyIn this article I seek to identify the pivotal elements in the political trajectory of the Nizhnii Novgorod region since the beginning of the 1990s until present; from the first democratic experiences and innovations to their disavowal and repudiation. I intend to trace the main cycles of region’s political developments and on this basis define the specificity of its political system and relations with the federal center. By doing so, I retrospectively look at the evolution of the political landscape in the region during a quarter of century, from the first post-Soviet years to mature Putinism, and then discuss how political controversies take cultural form and are reflected in regional identity debates.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , A Tale of Two Orthodoxies: Europe in Religious Discourses of Russia and Georgia(Routledge, 2018) Makarychev, Andrey; Kakabadze, ShotaThe article seeks to analyze discourses of two Orthodox Churches—Georgian (GOC) and Russian (ROC)—from the vantage point of their various interconnections with Europe and the ensuing representations of Europe framed in religious terms. Of particular salience are relations between ROC and GOC, on the one hand, and the Roman Catholic Church, on the other, as well as the positioning of both ROC and GOC within the global community of Orthodox Churches. The analyzed political circumstances force religious hierarchs of both institutions, even if they share the similar ambivalence toward the West, to differently reproduce the image of Europe. The broader geopolitical picture puts the GOC in the position of supporting government’s foreign policy agenda which goes in opposition to the Kremlin, in spite of the fact that the former has a lot of common with the Moscow Patriarchate when it comes to criticism toward the Western liberal value systems.listelement.badge.dso-type Kirje , World society as collective identity: world society, international society, and inclusion/exclusion from Europe(2018) Linsenmaier, ThomasIn a world of regions, inside/outside dynamics—the identity politics of international society—are effectively reinstated. Accounting for these dynamics from an English School (ES) perspective requires, first, prior clarification of the place and role of the concept of identity in ES theory. Constitutive of society in both inter-state and inter-human domain, of international and world society, respectively, identity arguably is key to social structural ES theorising. This is visible in, second, the (in-)congruence of identities across domains, constellations of international and world society, instilling a state with the desire for belonging. Induced in this way is the ‘movement’ of a state in international society, triggering the identity politics of (regional) international society. This is illustrated, third, by the patterns of inclusion and exclusion currently on display at the Eastern boundary of the contemporary European society of states that transpire as the result of ‘neighbourhood’ states aspiring to join ‘Europe’.
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »