George Berkeley traktaadis “De motu” esitatud kriitikast Isaac Newtoni gravitatsioonikontseptsiooni suhtes
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Tartu Ülikool
Abstract
Current work analyzes the critical argumentation presented by George Berkeley in
his essay De Motu towards the concept of gravity by Isaac Newton. In the wider
historical context of different contemporary schools in natural philosophy, different
diachronic themes and problematic issues in the concept of gravity as recognized by
Newton himself, Berkeley’s argumentation is analyzed and systematized as four
arguments: terminological vagueness, use of fictional entitities, explanation of
phenomena by occult qualities, and the issue of force as a substance.
As we see, all these are found in many other authors of the era. From the
modern point of view, some analogies to Berkeley’s arguments have been used in
modern physics, inducing and introducing new theories in cosmology, quantum
physics, and theory of relativity. Evidently, Berkeley’s argumentation is if not valid,
then definitely deserving more attention and a more thorough analysis than it has
received until now. Throughout the work, several perspectives for further Berkeleian studies are noted. Concerning the question of instrumentalism, the author doubts its foundation as such in Berkeley’s De motu , and queries, whether the whole theory might be anachronistic. Analysis is accompanied by a partial translation of De Motu into Estonian.
Description
Keywords
George Berkeley, Newtoni gravitatsioonikäsitlus, natuurfilosoofia