Politics of history on the screen: unveiling the continuity of myths in Polish state-endorsed cinema
Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Tartu Ülikool
Abstract
This thesis examines cinematic portrayals of the Warsaw Uprising in historical fiction films
endorsed by two ideologically divergent regimes: the Polish United Workers’ Party (PZPR) and
the Law and Justice Party (PiS). Both regimes advanced conflicting memory of Polish history,
tailoring the discourses to align with their respective ideological agendas by focalizing or
silencing some pages of history. However, through a comparative analysis of films endorsed by
the regimes, this thesis argues that the PZPR and PiS followed the same template in constructing
their memory narratives that framed Poland as a nation of exceptional heroism and martyrdom,
and justified an uncritical approach to politics of history. This thesis analyzes cinematic
narratives presented in films about the Warsaw Uprising—a traumatic historical event that was
marked by “blank spots” in the official memory during the People’s Republic of Poland but
became an widely commemorated and glorified event, emblematic of Polish collective identity
under PiS-led politics of history. A cinematic discourse analysis of six state-endorsed
productions (five feature films and one episode from a popular television series released between
the 1950s-1970s and the 2010s) was conducted to identify, decode, and interpret memory
narratives and depictions of heroism using elements of the dominant Polish myth. The
interpretation of the cinematic renderings of the Uprising relied on concepts of collective
identity, national myths and schematic narrative templates, and considered the ideological, social
and political contexts in which the films were produced. The research demonstrates that, while
introducing some critical reflections and “remembering” the Uprising differently, the
state-enforsed films produced under both regimes build their narratives on the dominant myth of
Poland being “Christ Among Nations”. Ultimately, this thesis seeks to understand why
seemingly ideologically divergent political regimes deploy similar narrative strategies.