Euroopa Liidu ühtse välispoliitika kujunemine konflikti lahendamisel – Liibüa konflikti näitel
| dc.contributor.advisor | Veebel, Viljar, juhendaja | |
| dc.contributor.author | Naaber, Meelis | |
| dc.contributor.other | Tartu Ülikool. Sotsiaal- ja haridusteaduskond | et |
| dc.contributor.other | Tartu Ülikool. Riigiteaduste instituut | et |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-14T12:03:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-11-14T12:03:02Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The Lisbon Treaty introduced significant changes to the structure of the Common Security and Foreign Policy of the European Union. The crisis in Libya was the first serious test for the new institutions and members states under the new agreement. The geographical proximity of the conflict and the large influence it had on southern member states demanded action from the EU. The purpose of this thesis was to analyze the possibilities, obstacles and results of the formation of a common foreign policy in the EU in the light of the Europeanization process. In order to achieve these three objectives had to be solved. Firstly, a theoretical approach to the integration of the EU had to be selected as a comparicement for the case study. Secondly, an analysis of the behavior patterns of the actor in the foreign policy sphere was necessary. Lastly, a case study on the Libyan conflict of 2011 was conducted to examine the real life implications of theoretical aspects. Among member states some indications of Europeanization was found, but no progress in comparison with previous actions. France continually tried to upload its policies in order to amplify them. Germany had shown marks of Europeanization in the past but completely discarded them during the Libyan crisis. Great Britain continued its pragmatical relationship with the EU. The results of the study showed a lack of utilization of the mechanisms of Europeanization in the common foreign policy of the EU and the actions of the member states. The institutions of the European Union, with Catherine Ashton as the High Representative of CFSP in initiative, did not fulfill the expectations laid on them. The analysis of her actions and statements showed rather the lack of intensions then possibilities to carry her position into effect. In conclusion, the conducted case study showed rather the ongoing domination of the intergovermentalistic approach to the common foreign policy of the EU then strengthening of the mechanisms of Europeanization. | en |
| dc.description.uri | http://tartu.ester.ee/record=b2626766~S1*est | et |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10062/28070 | |
| dc.language.iso | et | et |
| dc.publisher | Tartu Ülikool | |
| dc.subject.other | Euroopa Liit | et |
| dc.subject.other | välispoliitika | et |
| dc.subject.other | rahvusvahelised suhted | et |
| dc.subject.other | konfliktid | et |
| dc.subject.other | konfliktijuhtimine | et |
| dc.subject.other | Liibüa | et |
| dc.subject.other | bakalaureusetööd | et |
| dc.title | Euroopa Liidu ühtse välispoliitika kujunemine konflikti lahendamisel – Liibüa konflikti näitel | et |
| dc.title.alternative | The formation of European Union common foreign policy on conflict resolution - the Lybian conflict | en |
| dc.type | Other | en |